Print Email Comment share on Facebook Share on twitter
Print this page
Email link to this page
Send comments about this page
Share on facebook
Share on twitter

EPPO Standard PP1/241(1)
Guidance on comparable climates

 

Specific scope
This Standard provides guidance to regulatory authorities and applicants in determining comparability of climatic conditions between geographical areas where efficacy evaluation trials on plant protection products are performed. It describes in particular four climatic zones in the EPPO region, within each of which climatic conditions may be considered comparable.

Specific approval and amendment
Approved in 2005-09.

 
click to enlarge
 
(click to enlarge)

You can also download this standard as a pdf file

 

Introduction

The main purpose of EPPO efficacy evaluation standards has been to harmonize the process of efficacy evaluation within the registration procedures in EPPO member countries by describing how field trials should be conducted. More recently, these standards have taken on formal importance within the registration process of the European Union, through their adoption under Council Directive 91/414/EEC as amended by Commission Directive 93/71/EEC (EU, 1991, 1993). This includes the requirement that organizations conducting work in EU member states should be official or officially recognized.

The published EPPO standards have also facilitated an important secondary aim, to use data generated from one country to support registration in another country. This is particularly relevant for members of the European Union since the introduction of Directive 91/414/EEC. Applicants are now beginning to generate data for dossiers on a Europe-wide basis. In addition, there is a specific provision under Article 10 of the Directive for the mutual recognition of authorizations from other Member States. In both of these cases, not only is the conduct of the trials important, but the applicant and the registration authority should be able to establish the relevance of the data by determining whether the appropriate conditions of future use of a product are comparable.

This Standard aims to assist both regulatory authorities and applicants in determining the comparability of conditions between given areas. It specifically addresses the issue of climate and presents agreed defined zones in the EPPO region within which conditions are considered climatically comparable. Applicants can use this standard by referring to these defined zones rather than making a detailed case involving the submission of meteorological data. Resources will also be saved for all parties, since such cases will not have to be re-submitted with each application. Further information on how the zones were defined is provided by Bouma (2005 ).

Climate is only one factor that may affect the efficacy and crop safety of a product. The applicant will still need to address any other relevant factors (agronomic, edaphic, target-related) when establishing the relevance of data generated within different countries. The relative importance of each condition will depend on various factors including mode of action of the active substance, formulation type and intended use.

Finally, it is very important to remember that, even when climatic conditions are not comparable, use of the data may still be acceptable, since it may be possible to argue that the identified differences represent a more challenging situation, and the data can therefore be accepted for evaluation.

 

Use of this Standard

General
Typically, the meteorological data reported in efficacy evaluation trials conducted following EPPO Standards provides a basis for acceptability of trial results. It is for the applicant to justify the relevance of this meteorological data, but generally the closer the locality of the trials to the proposed region (i.e. the country where a given plant protection products is intended to be used and where the applicant is seeking registration), the more likely are the trial results to be acceptable.

This standard describes zones of comparable climates. When both the trial locations and proposed regions of use are within the same defined zone, then the applicant may simply refer to this guidance to establish climate comparability.

Defined zones
The zones have been defined by taking into account differences between the agro-climatic sub-areas of the EPPO region (Bouma, 2005). The conclusion is that the following four zones are appropriate: the Mediterranean zone, the Maritime zone, the North-East zone and the South-east zone.
  • the Mediterranean zone includes the countries or parts of countries around the Mediterranean sea, together with Jordan, Macedonia and Portugal.
  • the Maritime zone is the zone north of the line from the coastal zone of south-west France, through Lyon (France), to the south border of Switzerland and Austria, west of the border between Austria and Hungary, west of the border between Czech Republic and Slovakia, west of the river Oder (between Poland and Germany). This zone also includes Ireland, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
  • the North-east zone is the zone in the north-eastern part of Europe: the countries and the regions east of the river Oder (between Poland and Germany), north of the border between Czech Republic and Poland, west of the border between Poland and Ukraine, north of the border between Ukraine and Belarus, Russia north of 50 ° latitude.
  • the South-east zone includes Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Moldova, Romania, Russia south of 50° latitude, Slovakia, Slovenia, Serbia and Montenegro, Turkey, Ukraine, except the Mediterranean coastal zones.

click to enlarge

These zones are presented above, which also indicates that there is an area of gradual change in climate between the zones proposed. Data from other zones may in any case be considered acceptable if the actual prevailing conditions are comparable.

Note: Mountain areas above 1000 m altitude are not involved in the agro-climatic zones.

 

Other factors relevant to the use of data generated in different areas

Climate is only one factor in establishing the relevance of data from one region to another. Below are some of the other conditions which may need to be considered. It is not possible to provide a prescriptive list as this will depend on the individual circumstances of use, mode of action, physical and chemical properties of the product. Instead, the case for comparability should focus on those factors relevant to the product that may affect performance or crop safety, and on the biology and pathogenicity of the target.

 

Edaphic conditions

For soil-applied products, it is important to consider soil types, organic matter content and pH. In addition it may also be important to consider soil moisture content/deficit during the growing season.

Agronomic conditions
Cultural conditions and agronomy (e.g. crop rotation, cultivations used, application methods, cultivars, fertilizer regime, relative times of planting and harvest) may need to be considered if it is thought that these differ from those of the target country.

Differences in biology and pressure of target pests
It will sometimes be necessary to consider specific details on the target pest, and whether the conditions encountered in other regions are likely to represent a harsher or less harsh test of the product (for both effectiveness and crop safety). Such detail would include differences in the epidemiology of diseases, population dynamics of insects and other pests and differences in races of organism to be controlled. The resistance status of the target in the relevant regions should be considered.

 

References

Bouma E (2005) Development of comparable agro-climatic zones. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 35 (2), 233-238.

EU (1991) Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Official Journal of the European Communities L230, 1-32.

EU (1993) Council Directive 93/71/EEC amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Official Journal of the European Communities L221, 27-36.

 

Back